SNF Billing
   Medicare  *  Medicaid Update          Updated JANUARY 22, 2010
MEDICARE

For all of the latest news and information about Medicare
and the ambulance fee schedule, visit:

www.arkmedicare.com    -or-   www.cms.gov

MEDICAID

Visit the official Arkansas Medicaid website today:

www.medicaid.state.ar.us
 

MEDICARE CUTS VITAL EMS FUNDING - URGENT CALL TO ACTION!!
*Received from the American Ambulance Association 1-22-2010

On January 19, Republican Scott Brown defeated Democrat Martha Coakley for the Massachusetts Senate seat left vacant by the death of the late Senator Edward Kennedy. The surprise Republican victory stunned Congressional Democrats and put the future of comprehensive health reform in jeopardy. It also likely changes the legislative vehicle and strategy for the enactment of ambulance relief extensions.

On December 24, 2009, the Senate passed its version of a health care reform bill, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (H.R. 3590), on a party-line vote of 60-39. Since that time, Senate and House Democratic leadership had been working to merge the Senate bill with the Affordable Care for American Act (H.R. 3962), the previously-approved House health care reform legislation. Leadership planned to approve the merged legislation in both the House and Senate before sending it to the President for his signature.

Brown's election gave Republicans 41 seats in the Senate, depriving Senate Democrats of their 60 vote filibuster-proof majority and making it possible for Senate Republicans to block any piece of legislation that they unite to oppose. During the campaign, Senator-elect Brown promised to vote against the Democratic health care reform bill, and his election killed the idea of approving any merged legislation in the Senate.

Since the Senate had already-approved health care reform legislation, the House had the option of simply passing the Senate bill and sending it to President Obama for his signature. However, the House Democratic caucus was unable to agree upon various provisions of the Senate legislation, including a tax on high-cost health plans, special treatment of individual states, and state-based insurance exchanges. In addition, many House Democrats see the Massachusetts election as an expression of voter frustration related to the health care bill and are concerned with moving forward on the measure. Speaker Nancy Pelosi has stated that she does not have enough votes to pass the Senate health care bill in the House.

House and Senate Democrats are now discussing passing a scaled-back health care bill that would include provisions of the larger health care bill that have broad support. Although details of such a bill are unclear, it is likely that it would include such provisions as expanding coverage through tax credits, ending discrimination based on pre-existing conditions, transitioning provider payment to a value-based system, and repealing insurance companies' antitrust exemption. The scaled-back bill might then be followed up with a bill containing less-popular financing provisions under reconciliation, a process that requires only a majority vote to achieve passage.

Both the House and Senate health care reform bills contained extensions of ambulance relief. The House legislation contained a two-year extension of the 2% urban and 3% rural ambulance relief adjustments. The Senate legislation contained a one-year extension of the 2% urban and 3% rural relief, as well as an extension of super rural relief. With comprehensive health reform stalling in Congress, the AAA will need to identify other legislative opportunities and engage in extensive grassroots efforts to ensure inclusion of ambulance relief in a moving legislative vehicle in the near future. We will let you know shortly the details of our strategy with a request to contact your Members of Congress to push for extensions of Medicare ambulance relief absent health care reform.

#######

9/30/2009

Ambulance Providers Encouraged to Contact Senators Now!
ENCOURAGE PERMANENT MEDICARE AMBULANCE RELIEF

*Received from the American Ambulance Association 9.30.2009

Even though Medicare ambulance relief extensions are now included in the health care reform proposal by the Senate Finance Committee, please continue to contact your Senators.  The Senate Finance Committee is currently considering health care reform legislation and we need to ensure that the provision remains in the final bill.  It is therefore critical that you call your Senators about including extensions of Medicare ambulance relief in any health care bill passed by the Senate Finance Committee. Please act today!

All the temporary Medicare ambulance relief provisions expire at the end of this year.  This includes the 2% urban and 3% rural increases, the "super rural" bonus payment of an additional 22.6% to the base rate and the remaining partial relief from the regional fee schedule.  It is therefore critical that Congress extend Medicare ambulance relief before this happens.  Ambulance providers are encouraged to call their Senators and ask that they support including Medicare ambulance relief in health care reform legislation and, if they have not done so already, that they cosponsor the Medicare Ambulance Access Preservation Act (S. 1066).

About the Medicare Ambulance Access Preservation Act

The Medicare Ambulance Access Preservation Act (MAAPA) was introduced in the Senate by Senators Charles Schumer (D-NY), Pat Roberts (R-KS), Kent Conrad (D-ND) and Jeff Sessions (R-AL) and in the House by Congressmen Richard Neal (D-MA) and Fred Upton (R-MI).  MAAPA would provide a permanent 6% Medicare increase for transports originating in an urban or rural area and permanently extend the bonus base payment of 22.6% for transports originating in super rural areas.  If Congress does not act on Medicare ambulance relief by the end of this year, ambulance service providers will lose a minimum of 2% in urban areas, 3% in rural areas and 17% in super rural areas.

Arkansas' Sponsors To Date:

Sen. Blanche Lincoln, Sen. Mark Pryor

----------------------------------------------------------

9/30/2009

CMS Issues Transmittal regarding Multiple Patients Ambulance Transports
Received from American Ambulance Association aritlce by Brian S. Werfel, Esq.

On September 25, 2009, CMS issued Transmittal 1821 (Change Request 6621), which updates Chapter 15 of the Medicare Claims Processing Manual (Pub. 100-04) by adding specific instructions on how Medicare contractors should process claims for ambulance transports involving multiple patients.  This new Transmittal does not change current Medicare coverage or payment policy for these transports.

The Transmittal instructs ambulance suppliers billing Part B to use the "GM" modifier whenever they transport multiple patients in the same vehicle.  Ambulance suppliers should also list the number of patients transported and the HIC#s of each Medicare beneficiary in the Narrative on their claims.  Ambulance providers billing Part A are instructed to use Value Code "32" in these situations, and to report the number of patients transported in the amount field to the left of the delimiter.

Previous Transmittals issued in 2002 set forth Medicare's payment policy for these transports.  Under that policy, Medicare will pay 75% of the applicable base rate for each Medicare beneficiary when 2 patients are transported in the same vehicle, and 60% of the applicable base rate for each Medicare beneficiary when 3 or more patients are transported in the same vehicle.  The mileage is prorated between the patients for these transports.  This policy is set forth in Section 10.3.10 of Chapter 10 of the Medicare Benefit Policy Manual (Pub. 100-02).

The Transmittal can be downloaded from the CMS Website at: http://www.cms.hhs.gov/transmittals/downloads/R1821CP.pdf

--------------------------------------------------------------------

9/30/2009

Medicare to Start Editing Referring Source Field for NPI
Received from American Ambulance Association aritlce by Brian S. Werfel, Esq.

Effective October 5, 2009, Medicare contractors will begin editing the Referring Source fields, and to deny claims that list an ordering/referring physician unless the claims also lists a valid NPI for the ordering/referring physician.  With the implementation of the NPI, claims that list an ordering physician in Box 17 of the paper 1500 form (or the electronic equivalent) must also include a valid NPI for that physician in Box 17b (or the electronic equivalent).  However, up till now, Medicare contractors have not edited for these fields. 

In Transmittal 1251 (Change Request 5564), issued May 5, 2007, CMS confirmed that claims for ambulance services do not require the name of an ordering/referring physician.  As a result, is no longer necessary to list Surrogate UPINs such as OTHOOO or SLF000.  Instead, these fields should be left blank for all ambulance claims.

Members should confirm that their billing software is no longer transmitting anything in these fields.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

9/30/2009

KEEP UP WITH THE LATEST NEWS AND INFORMATION CONCERNING THE J7 MAC AWARD
TRAILBLAZER HEALTH


Visit the Trailblazer website and register for AMBULANCE LISTSERV updates.

http://www.trailblazerhealth.com/J7/Default.aspx

Stop-Work Order for J7 MAC Award

On July 10, 2009, TrailBlazer was awarded the contract to serve as the Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC) for Jurisdiction 7 (J7), which includes the states of Arkansas, Louisiana and Mississippi.

On July 21, 2009, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) notified TrailBlazer that the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) received a protest of CMS' J7 award. This has resulted in a stop-work order in accordance with federal acquisition regulations. TrailBlazer has been directed to immediately stop all work in support of the J7 contract. This stop-work order is in effect until the final resolution of the protest. CMS periodically updates the status of the MAC procurements on its Contracting Reform Web page.

TrailBlazer will share more information through this J7 MAC Implementation Web site and MAC listservs as details become available on how this decision will affect providers. Please check this site regularly for important updates regarding the J7 MAC implementation.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

7/19/2009

AMBULANCE INFLATION FACTOR FOR 2010 IS ... 0.00%

The ambulance inflation factor, used to increase Medicare reimbursement rates each year for ambulance, is based on the increase in the CPI Urban, from June to June each year.  Based on the recent statistics published by the U.S. Department of Labor, the increase in the CPI – Urban from June 2008 to June 2009 actually declined. As a result of the weak economy and decrease in consumer pricing, the 2010 CPI Inflation Index Charge (IIC) for 2010 will be 0.00%.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

ArAA MEDICARE-MEDICAID NEWS ARCHIVES

March 16, 2007

BREAKING NEWS

CMS has decided to extend the acceptance period of the Form CMS-1500 (12-90) version beyond the original April 1, 2007 deadline

Here are some excerpts from the announcement CMS released: 

It has recently come to our attention that there are incorrectly formatted versions of the revised form being sold by print vendors, specifically the Government Printing Office (GPO). After reviewing the situation, the GPO has determined that the source files they received from the NUCC’s authorized forms designer were improperly formatted. This resulted in the sale of both printed forms and negatives which do not comply with the form specifications.

Given the circumstances, CMS has decided to extend the acceptance period of the Form CMS-1500 (12-90) version beyond the original April 1, 2007 deadline while this situation is resolved. Medicare contractors will be directed to continue to accept the Form CMS-1500 (12-90) until notified by CMS to cease. At present, we are targeting June 1, 2007 as that date. In addition, during the interim contractors will be directed to return, not manually key, any Form CMS-1500 (08-05) forms received which are not printed to specification. By returning the incorrectly formatted claim forms back to you, we are able to make you aware of the situation which will allow you to begin communications with your form supplier

The best way to identify if your CMS-1500 (08-05) version forms are correct is by looking at the upper right hand corner of the form. On properly formatted claim forms, there will be approximately a ¼” gap between the tip of the red arrow above the vertically stacked word “CARRIER” and the top edge of the paper. If the tip of the red arrow is touching or close to touching the top edge of the paper, then the form is not printed to specifications.

Here is the direct link to CMS regarding this notice: http://www.medicarenhic.com/whats_new/current/cmsformdelay_0307.htm


November 16, 2006

CMS Releases Advance Copy of Ambulance Final Rule

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has just released an advance copy of a Final Rule regarding changes to the ambulance fee schedule regulations. The Final Rule is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on December 1, 2006. According to the advance text of the Final Rule, CMS is

  1. withdrawing its proposed changes to the "Specialty Care Transport" and "Emergency Response" definitions,
  2. adopting a new approach to classifying "rural" areas for ambulance payment purposes.
  3. announcing the 2007 ambulance inflation factor which has been set at 4.3%.

The entire summary and downloadable Final Rule can be found on the Page, Wolfeburg, and Worth (PWW Law) website, www.pwwemslaw.com. The link to the article is on the front page under the "EMS Law Bulletins" section. Please note that the advance copy is unofficial and that the official version of the Final Rule is the one that will be published in the Federal Register, which is scheduled to occur on December 1, 2006.



CMS POSTS 2006 MEDICARE RATES & RELATED INFORMATION

CMS has posted the 2006 Medicare rates. Go to the following :

http://www.cms.hhs.gov/AmbulanceFeeSchedule/02_afspuf.asp#TopOfPage

Scroll down for the 2006 rates. At the site, you will find the 2006 rates, listing base, mileage, rural, non-rural, etc.  They also have a fact sheet and a listing that lists each state and Carrier. 

As you know, this year, the Medicare Ambulance Fee Schedule is at 100% of the fee schedule basis. Also, Q-codes are no longer accepted, oxygen supplies, night, EKG, drugs are also included in the base rates.  Providers can now bill only base fees plus mileage.

--------------------------

MEDICARE PROVIDER ADVISORY GROUP MEETING
Wednesday, April 19, 2006 10:30 A.M.
Medicare Services Center, N. Little Rock

A summary of the PAG meeting will be posted here soon.

- - - - - - - - - - - - -

Reminder--Health care providers are required by law to apply for a National Provider Identifier (NPI). To apply online, visit: https://nppes.cms.hhs.gov,

Announcing the new CMS web page dedicated to providing all the latest NPI news for Fee-For-Service (FFS) Medicare providers!  Visit http://www.cms.hhs.gov/providers/npi/default.asp on the web.  While this page is dedicated to the FFS community, it contains helpful information and links that may benefit all health care providers. 

Melissa Scarborough, MPH, CHES
Provider Outreach Specialist
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
1301 Young Street, Suite 827
Dallas, Texas 75202
Phone: 214-767-4407
Fax: 214-767-0323

- - - - - - - - - - - - -

Posted from PWW EMSLawlines January 2005 Edition
www.pwwemslaw.com

Medicare’s New Initiative to Reduce “Error Rates”:  Will You Be Ready for An Audit? . . .

 CMS recently announced that it plans to implement a comprehensive initiative over the next four years to reduce the provider compliance error rate in Medicare payments by 4%.  The initiative, which includes ambulance claims, is a result of an expanded program by CMS to collect more detailed and specific information from its contracted carriers.  Fiscal year (FY) 2004 was the first year for the new collection and analysis techniques.  It will likely lead to more Medicare audits of ambulance service claims as the federal government continues to scrutinize Medicare payments more closely.  

 This review was the most extensive ever, providing CMS with more accurate information about contractor-specific error rates, error rates by provider type, and error rates by service type, including ambulance.  According to the CMS announcement, this level of detail and accuracy (which is unprecedented in CMS history) will help CMS identify problem areas and target improvement efforts more effectively.  The review also revealed that the use of “best practices” by Medicare carriers significantly reduces error rates. 

 The CMS announcement comes on the heels of the Office of Inspector General (OIG) Semiannual Report, which details accomplishments from OIG activities and initiatives from April 1 through September 30, 2004. The OIG reported savings to taxpayers of almost $30 billion: $27.3 billion in implemented recommendations, $754.2 million in audit receivables, $8.3 million in additional audit recoveries, and $1.9 billion in investigational receivables.  These substantial numbers are ever increasing evidence of the government’s increased enforcement initiatives.  For the OIG report, go to:  www.cms.hhs.gov/CERT

 Under the error rate reduction initiative, CMS identified error rates for a wide range of billing codes, broken down by carrier.  For ambulance service claims, BC/BS of Rhode Island had the highest “error rate” in the continental United States at 14.4%.  The chart below gives an indication of the error rates of selected contractors for ambulance service claims:  

 

Contractor Name

Projected $ Incorrectly Paid

Error Rate

First Coastal Service Options

$5,843,685

3.9 %

Empire NY/NJ

$6,413,249

3.3 %

HGSA PA

$11,797,100

5.3%

Palmetto GBA OH/WV

$4,324,720

2.4%

Trailblazer MD/DC/DE/VA

$7,304

0.0%

NHIC CA

$29,743,788

10.9%

 

According to CMS Administrator Mark B. McClellan, M.D., PhD, CMS hopes to eventually identify individual providers who have a high incidence of billing errors.  What does that mean for ambulance services?  Make sure your “billing house” is in order!

The Best Practices initiative will focus on the new data techniques and provider education.  CMS discovered that provider and contractor education were the best current tool for reducing the error rate. 

             Another area of focus for CMS will be on the response rate of providers asked to supply additional information to CMS for “questionable” claims.  Many of these claims will deal with the age-old problem of documenting medical necessity.  When CMS asks for additional information, if the provider does not send it, CMS records the claim as an error and sends it back to the provider.  The new initiative will attempt to reduce the number of claims listed as errors because the requested information was never sent.  This will mean greater efforts by CMS to obtain the requested information.  As a first step, CMS is extending the time period for supplying additional information from 55 to 90 days.  CMS will also employ an “Error Rate Contractor” responsible for lowering the poor response rate. 

            CMS’s new efforts will likely have a large impact on ambulance providers throughout the country.  The attempt to reduce the error rate will no doubt mean more audits and reviews for individual providers as well as more scrutiny for routinely submitted claims.  Also, keep in mind that provider education has traditionally been a first step in CMS corrective procedures and any provider education resulting from errors identified by CMS may open the door to more severe corrective actions, such as pre-payment review, if errors persist. 

 Steps to Take Now

             Ambulance services should insure that their compliance practices and procedures are up to date and being enforced.  Additionally, increased training in the areas traditionally flagged by Medicare such as medical necessity and documentation will help insure that your ambulance service breezes through the increased scrutiny this error reduction effort is sure to bring. 

Emergency Calls.  We are already seeing increased audit activity by carriers with respect to ALS assessments and use of HCPCS Code A0427, ALS 1- Emergency.  Documentation that is critical to adequately evaluate a claim includes:  1) dispatch protocols; 2) call intake and dispatch information (especially nature of the call at dispatch); 3) evidence that the ambulance is staffed by an ALS crew; 4) evidence of a 911 type dispatch and an emergency response; and 5) evidence that an ALS assessment was performed by a paramedic.

Non-Emergency Calls. Ambulance field providers should be trained to make sure that in non-emergency transports Physician Certification Statements (PCSs) are completed by the sending facility and signed by the appropriate person.  The PCS should contain as much detail as possible about not just the patient’s mobility status, but also a description as to why transportation by ambulance service was medically required.  Billing personnel should be trained to look for incomplete or inaccurate PCS forms.  A procedure should be in place to ensure that incomplete PCS forms are completed by the appropriate person. 

- - - - - - - - -

SNF Ambulance Services

(Rev.163, 4-30-04 )

SNF-516.2

The following ambulance transportation and related ambulance services for residents in a Part A stay are not included in the Part A PPS payment. Except for specific exclusions, consolidated billing includes those medically necessary ambulance trips that are furnished during the course of a covered Part A stay. Carriers are responsible for assuring that payment is made only for ambulance services that meet established coverage criteria.

In most cases, ambulance trips are excluded from consolidated billing when resident status has ended. The ambulance company then must bill the carrier directly for payment. Listed below are a number of specific circumstances under which a beneficiary may receive ambulance services that are covered by Medicare, but excluded from consolidated billing.

The following ambulance services may be billed as Part B services by the supplier in the following situations only.

  • The ambulance trip is to the SNF for admission (the second character (destination) of any ambulance HCPCS modifier is N (SNF) other than modifier QN, and the date of service is the same as the SNF 21X admission date.);
  • The ambulance trip is from the SNF after discharge, to the beneficiary’s home where the beneficiary will receive services from a Medicare participating home health agency under a plan of care (the first character (origin) of any HCPCS ambulance modifier is N (SNF)), and date of ambulance service is the same date as the SNF through date and the SNF patient status is other than 30;
  • The ambulance trip is to a hospital based or nonhospital based ESRD facility (either one of any HCPCS ambulance modifier codes is G (Hospital based dialysis facility) or J (Non-hospital based dialysis facility) for the purpose of receiving dialysis and related services excluded from consolidated billing;
  • The ambulance trip is from the SNF to a Medicare participating hospital or a CAH for an inpatient admission;
  • The ambulance trip after a formal discharge or other departure from the SNF to any destination other than another SNF, and the beneficiary does not return to that or any other SNF by midnight of that same day; and
  • Ambulance service that conveys a beneficiary to a hospital or CAH and back to the SNF, for the specific purpose of receiving emergency or other excluded services.

Note that ambulance trips associated with services provided in renal dialysis facilities (RDFs) are also excluded from SNF consolidated billing. Effective April 1, 2002 , payment shall be the amount prescribed in the ambulance fee schedule.

NOTE: A beneficiary’s transfer from one SNF to another before midnight of the same day, and ambulance transports to or from a diagnostic or therapeutic site other than a physician’s office or hospital (e.g., an independent diagnostic testing facility (IDTF), cancer treatment center, radiation therapy center, wound care center), are not excluded from consolidated billing. The first SNF is responsible for billing the services to the FI.

See Chapter 15 for Ambulance Services.

SNF BILLING

(Rev.163, 4-30-04 )

SNF-516.2, SNF QA Day4

The following ambulance transportation and related ambulance services for residents in a Part A stay are not included in the PPS rate. They may be billed as Part B services by the supplier in only the following situations.

  • The ambulance trip is to the SNF for admission (the second character (destination) of any ambulance HCPCS code modifier is N (SNF) other than modifier QN, and the date of service is the same as the SNF 21X admission date.)
  • The ambulance trip is from the SNF to home (the first character (origin) of any HCPCS code ambulance modifier is N (SNF)), and date of ambulance service is the same date as the SNF through date, and the SNF patient status (FL 22) is other than 30.)
  • The ambulance trip is to a hospital based or nonhospital based ESRD facility (either one of any HCPCS code ambulance modifier codes is G (Hospital based dialysis facility) or J (Nonhospital based dialysis facility).
  • The ambulance trip is from the SNF to another SNF (the first and second character (origin and destination) of any ambulance HCPCS code modifier is “N” (SNF)) and the beneficiary is not in a Part A stay.

Ambulance associated with the following outpatient hospital service exclusions payment is under the ambulance fee schedule:

  • Cardiac catheterization;
  • Computerized axial tomography (CT) scans;
  • Magnetic resonance imaging (MRIs);
  • Ambulatory surgery involving the use of an operating room;
  • Emergency services;
  • Angiography;
  • Lymphatic and Venous Procedures; and
  • Radiology therapy.

Finally, ambulance transportation for removal, replacement, and insertion of PEG tubes is an excluded service under consolidated billing for Part A and is not considered an SNF service. Therefore, that ambulance is also excluded from SNF consolidated billing (CB), and the service would be billed to the carrier under Part B.

When not subject to SNF CB, claims for drugs and EKG testing administered during a transport to or from a SNF are separately payable during the AFS transition period only in those carrier jurisdictions that allowed separate payment for J-codes and EKG testing prior to the implementation of the AFS. (Only Method 3 and Method 4 suppliers in carrier jurisdictions that allowed separate payment for these services prior to April 1, 2002 may bill separately for J-codes and EKG testing during the transition period.)

Carriers in those jurisdictions that allow separate billing for J-codes and EKG testing apply the appropriate reasonable charge percentage for the AFS transition year (40% in 2004) to the reasonable charge amount for these codes. (Because separately billable items are not recognized under the fee schedule, there is no FS portion for these codes.) In jurisdictions where separate payment for J-codes and EKG testing was not permitted prior to April 1, 2002 , carriers shall deny supplier claims for such services.

The following ambulance transportation and related ambulance services for residents in a Part A stay are included in the SNF PPS rate and may not be billed as Part B services by the supplier. In these scenarios, the services provided are subject to SNF CB and the first SNF is responsible for billing the services to the intermediary:

  • A beneficiary’s transfer from one SNF to another before midnight of the same day. The first and second characters (origin and destination) of any HCPCS code ambulance modifier are “N” (SNF).
  • A transport between two SNFs is not separately payable when a beneficiary is in a Part A covered SNF stay, and will result in a denial of a claim for such a transport. When billing for ambulance transports, suppliers should indicate whether the transport was part of a SNF Part A covered stay, using the appropriate origin/destination modifier (e.g., “NH” for a transport from a SNF to a hospital).
  • Suppliers should bill with an “NN” origin/destination modifier when a SNF to SNF transport occurs. A transport between two SNFs is not separately payable when a beneficiary is in a Part A covered SNF stay, and will result in a denial of a claim for such a transport.
Ambulance transports to or from a diagnostic or therapeutic site other than a physician’s office or hospital (e.g., an independent diagnostic testing facility (IDTF), cancer treatment center, radiation therapy center, wound care center, etc.). The first or second character (origin or destination) of any HCPCS code ambulance modifier is “D”, and the other modifier (origin or destination) is “N” (SNF).